Fri Aft 99er Pairs Only Session June 27, 2014
Scores after  8 rounds  Average:   84.0      Section  L  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      Overall Rank      MPs
                         G     H     I     G     H     I
  9   63.43  106.57  H   1     1           1     1          1.62(OG) Michael Hu - Linzhi Hu
  3   57.57   96.72  H   2     2           4     3          0.76(OH) Jackie Hiatt - Judy Reeve
  5   52.88   88.84  H   3     3                 4          0.57(OH) Mary Hopkins - George Hopkins
  7   50.73   85.22  H   4                       5          0.43(OH) Joel Reimnitz - Charlene Reimnitz
  2   49.83   83.71  G                                               Anne Gregor - Mary Savoie
  8   47.58   79.93  I               1                 2    0.60(OI) Dudley Harrelson - Karen Corburn
  6   43.96   73.86  H                                               Janice Flowers-Sonne - Isabel Shaw
  4   43.07   72.36  I                                               Joan Schlinkert - George Schlinkert
  1   40.68   68.35  H                                               Tomie Sera - Carolyn Tutko

Fri Aft 99er Pairs Only Session June 27, 2014
Scores after  8 rounds  Average:   84.0      Section  L  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      Overall Rank      MPs
                         G     H     I     G     H     I
  8   62.16  104.43  I   1     1     1     2     2     1    1.22(OG) Midge Robinson - Benita Jones
  2   61.69  103.64  G   2                 3                0.91(OG) Marjorie Chatfield - Tom Chatfield
  7   55.61   93.43  G   3                 5                0.51(OG) Diane Duey - Philip Hebner
  1   47.65   80.05  H   4     2                            0.45(SH) Kathryn Dougherty - William Dougherty
  6   45.70   76.77  H         3                            0.32(SH) Judy Anderson - Sue Kaupp
  5   44.39   74.57  H                                               Jayne Lipe - Gary Lipe
  4   44.35   74.50  I                                               Carolyn Darcey - Alex Passinsky
  3   44.21   74.28  H                                               Linda Chang - Neda Dorjath
  9   43.96   73.86  I                                               Cindy Desantis - Sandra Erickson

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
9 7 4
A K 9 6
J 6
K 7 5 4
Q
10 8 7 3 2
9 8 7 4
A 9 6
N
WE
S
K J 10 5 3 2
Q 4
A K 10
10 8
A 8 6
J 5
Q 5 3 2
Q J 3 2

EW 2; EW 1N; NS 2; EW 1; EW 1; Par −100: NS 3×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−31507.000.003-Hiatt-Reeve vs 5-Lipe-Lipe
2 W−1506.001.005-Hopkins-Hopkins vs 9-Desantis-Erickson
2 E21103.004.001-Sera-Tutko vs 1-Dougherty-Dougherty
2 E21103.004.004-Schlinkert-Schlinkert vs 7-Duey-Hebner
2 E21103.004.007-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 4-Darcey-Passinsky
2 E21103.004.008-Harrelson-Corburn vs 6-Anderson-Kaupp
2 E21103.004.009-Hu-Hu vs 8-Robinson-Jones
2 E41700.007.006-Flowers-Sonne-Shaw vs 2-Chatfield-Chatfield

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
A J 7
K 4 2
J 3
A 8 6 4 2
K
A 9 8 5
A K 10 7 5
K 10 5
N
WE
S
Q 9 8 5 4 2
Q 6 3
8
J 9 3
10 6 3
J 10 7
Q 9 6 4 2
Q 7

EW 3; EW 2N; EW 2; EW 1; EW 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTE−31507.000.005-Hopkins-Hopkins vs 9-Desantis-Erickson
3 W−21006.001.007-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 4-Darcey-Passinsky
2 W−1505.002.001-Sera-Tutko vs 1-Dougherty-Dougherty
2 W2904.003.006-Flowers-Sonne-Shaw vs 2-Chatfield-Chatfield
2 W21103.004.003-Hiatt-Reeve vs 5-Lipe-Lipe
2 NTN−22002.005.008-Harrelson-Corburn vs 6-Anderson-Kaupp
1 ×W22401.006.009-Hu-Hu vs 8-Robinson-Jones
3 NTW34000.007.004-Schlinkert-Schlinkert vs 7-Duey-Hebner

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
8 7 6
K 9 2
A 6 3
Q 8 5 4
K Q 10 2
5 4 3
Q J 10 9 2
6
N
WE
S
A J 9 4
A Q 8 6
5 4
K 10 2
5 3
J 10 7
K 8 7
A J 9 7 3

EW 3; EW 2; E 1N; EW 2; NS 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 W21105.501.501-Sera-Tutko vs 1-Dougherty-Dougherty
2 W21105.501.503-Hiatt-Reeve vs 5-Lipe-Lipe
2 E21105.501.505-Hopkins-Hopkins vs 9-Desantis-Erickson
1 W21105.501.506-Flowers-Sonne-Shaw vs 2-Chatfield-Chatfield
2 W31402.504.507-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 4-Darcey-Passinsky
2 W31402.504.509-Hu-Hu vs 8-Robinson-Jones
3 W41700.506.504-Schlinkert-Schlinkert vs 7-Duey-Hebner
2 W41700.506.508-Harrelson-Corburn vs 6-Anderson-Kaupp

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
A K J 8
A J 9
Q 4 2
A J 7
9 4
K 5 4
9 7 5
K Q 10 6 5
N
WE
S
Q 7 3 2
Q 10 8 7 3
6
9 3 2
10 6 5
6 2
A K J 10 8 3
8 4

N 5N; NS 5; S 4N; NS 5; NS 1; NS 1; Par +660

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN66907.000.007-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 3-Chang-Dorjath
3 NTN56604.003.001-Sera-Tutko vs 9-Desantis-Erickson
3 NTN56604.003.002-Gregor-Savoie vs 2-Chatfield-Chatfield
3 NTN56604.003.004-Schlinkert-Schlinkert vs 6-Anderson-Kaupp
3 NTN56604.003.008-Harrelson-Corburn vs 5-Lipe-Lipe
3 NTN56604.003.009-Hu-Hu vs 7-Duey-Hebner
3 NTN46301.006.006-Flowers-Sonne-Shaw vs 1-Dougherty-Dougherty
4 S51500.007.005-Hopkins-Hopkins vs 8-Robinson-Jones

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
A K 10 9
K J 10
A 5
K J 3 2
J 6 4
8 6 4
J 9 6 4 2
10 9
N
WE
S
7 5
9 2
K 8 7
A Q 7 6 5 4
Q 8 3 2
A Q 7 5 3
Q 10 3
8

NS 6; NS 5N; NS 5; N 2; N 2; S 1; S 1; Par +1430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 N614307.000.009-Hu-Hu vs 7-Duey-Hebner
4 N66805.501.504-Schlinkert-Schlinkert vs 6-Anderson-Kaupp
4 N66805.501.507-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 3-Chang-Dorjath
3 NTN56603.503.502-Gregor-Savoie vs 2-Chatfield-Chatfield
3 NTN56603.503.505-Hopkins-Hopkins vs 8-Robinson-Jones
4 S56501.505.501-Sera-Tutko vs 9-Desantis-Erickson
4 N56501.505.508-Harrelson-Corburn vs 5-Lipe-Lipe
4 S46200.007.006-Flowers-Sonne-Shaw vs 1-Dougherty-Dougherty

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
A 6 5 3
A K 3 2
K 7 4 3
7
8 7
J 7
A 10 9 5 2
A K 5 4
N
WE
S
10 4 2
Q 9 8 4
J 8
Q 8 6 2
K Q J 9
10 6 5
Q 6
J 10 9 3

NS 3; NS 3; NS 1N; S 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 N41707.000.009-Hu-Hu vs 7-Duey-Hebner
2 S31405.002.002-Gregor-Savoie vs 2-Chatfield-Chatfield
1 S31405.002.007-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 3-Chang-Dorjath
2 S31405.002.008-Harrelson-Corburn vs 5-Lipe-Lipe
2 N21102.504.504-Schlinkert-Schlinkert vs 6-Anderson-Kaupp
2 S21102.504.506-Flowers-Sonne-Shaw vs 1-Dougherty-Dougherty
2 W−11001.006.005-Hopkins-Hopkins vs 8-Robinson-Jones
1 W2900.007.001-Sera-Tutko vs 9-Desantis-Erickson

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
K 2
3
K Q J 6 4 3
J 9 5 4
Q 6 5 4
Q 7 5 4
A 10 9 2
6
N
WE
S
A
A K J 10 8 2
7
A 10 8 7 2
J 10 9 8 7 3
9 6
8 5
K Q 3

EW 7; W 4N; E 3N; EW 3; EW 1; EW 1; Par −2000: NS 7×−7

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S−33007.000.009-Hu-Hu vs 6-Anderson-Kaupp
4 E56505.501.503-Hiatt-Reeve vs 3-Chang-Dorjath
4 E56505.501.506-Flowers-Sonne-Shaw vs 9-Desantis-Erickson
4 E66803.503.505-Hopkins-Hopkins vs 7-Duey-Hebner
4 E66803.503.508-Harrelson-Corburn vs 4-Darcey-Passinsky
4 E77101.006.001-Sera-Tutko vs 8-Robinson-Jones
4 E77101.006.002-Gregor-Savoie vs 1-Dougherty-Dougherty
4 E77101.006.007-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 2-Chatfield-Chatfield

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
6 5 4 3
9 7 5
6 3 2
A 9 3
J 7
K Q 10 2
Q 10 5
K 6 4 2
N
WE
S
K 10 9 2
J 8 6 4 3
A 7
Q 5
A Q 8
A
K J 9 8 4
J 10 8 7

EW 2; NS 2; NS 1; Par −100: NS 3×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 S1707.000.008-Harrelson-Corburn vs 4-Darcey-Passinsky
2 E−1506.001.005-Hopkins-Hopkins vs 7-Duey-Hebner
1 NTN−1505.002.002-Gregor-Savoie vs 1-Dougherty-Dougherty
4 S−21004.003.009-Hu-Hu vs 6-Anderson-Kaupp
1 W21102.504.501-Sera-Tutko vs 8-Robinson-Jones
1 W21102.504.503-Hiatt-Reeve vs 3-Chang-Dorjath
3 E31400.506.506-Flowers-Sonne-Shaw vs 9-Desantis-Erickson
3 E31400.506.507-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 2-Chatfield-Chatfield

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
A 8 5 4
10 7
K 7
A 10 9 8 5
Q J
Q J 8 3
J 5 4 3
K 4 2
N
WE
S
K 9 2
A 2
A Q 10 9 8 2
Q 7
10 7 6 3
K 9 6 5 4
6
J 6 3

EW 4N; EW 4; NS 2; N 2; EW 1; S 1; Par −500: N 5×−3; NS 5×−3

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 E−22007.000.006-Flowers-Sonne-Shaw vs 9-Desantis-Erickson
5 E−11005.501.501-Sera-Tutko vs 8-Robinson-Jones
4 E−11005.501.509-Hu-Hu vs 6-Anderson-Kaupp
2 E31103.004.002-Gregor-Savoie vs 1-Dougherty-Dougherty
3 E31103.004.007-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 2-Chatfield-Chatfield
2 E31103.004.008-Harrelson-Corburn vs 4-Darcey-Passinsky
3 E41300.506.503-Hiatt-Reeve vs 3-Chang-Dorjath
3 E41300.506.505-Hopkins-Hopkins vs 7-Duey-Hebner

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
K 9 8
A K 9 6
9 8 6 4
10 4
A Q 5 2
5
A Q 10 5 3
Q 7 5
N
WE
S
J 7 6 3
J 10 8
7 2
A K 8 6
10 4
Q 7 4 3 2
K J
J 9 3 2

EW 5; EW 3; EW 3; EW 1N; NS 1; Par −650

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E−22007.000.003-Hiatt-Reeve vs 2-Chatfield-Chatfield
1 NTE21206.001.008-Harrelson-Corburn vs 3-Chang-Dorjath
2 E41704.003.001-Sera-Tutko vs 7-Duey-Hebner
2 E41704.003.004-Schlinkert-Schlinkert vs 4-Darcey-Passinsky
2 E41704.003.009-Hu-Hu vs 5-Lipe-Lipe
2 E52001.006.002-Gregor-Savoie vs 9-Desantis-Erickson
2 E52001.006.006-Flowers-Sonne-Shaw vs 8-Robinson-Jones
3 E52001.006.007-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 1-Dougherty-Dougherty

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
10 7 6
Q
K 10 9 8 4 3 2
J 2
Q 9
K 10 8 7 2
A J 7
6 5 4
N
WE
S
K J 8 3
J 6 4
Q
A Q 10 8 3
A 5 4 2
A 9 5 3
6 5
K 9 7

EW 4; EW 3N; EW 2; NS 2; EW 2; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ×N34707.000.009-Hu-Hu vs 5-Lipe-Lipe
3 N31106.001.004-Schlinkert-Schlinkert vs 4-Darcey-Passinsky
3 W−21005.002.007-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 1-Dougherty-Dougherty
3 N−21003.503.503-Hiatt-Reeve vs 2-Chatfield-Chatfield
3 N−21003.503.508-Harrelson-Corburn vs 3-Chang-Dorjath
2 W31401.505.502-Gregor-Savoie vs 9-Desantis-Erickson
3 W31401.505.506-Flowers-Sonne-Shaw vs 8-Robinson-Jones
3 NTW34000.007.001-Sera-Tutko vs 7-Duey-Hebner

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
10 4 2
9
Q 10 7 6
A Q 10 7 6
K Q 8 7
Q J 8 4
J 4 3
J 5
N
WE
S
J 9 6
10 7 6
A 9 8 2
K 8 4
A 5 3
A K 5 3 2
K 5
9 3 2

NS 4; NS 2N; NS 1; NS 1; NS 1; Par +130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS36007.000.002-Gregor-Savoie vs 9-Desantis-Erickson
1 NTN31505.501.507-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 1-Dougherty-Dougherty
1 NTN31505.501.509-Hu-Hu vs 5-Lipe-Lipe
3 N31104.003.008-Harrelson-Corburn vs 3-Chang-Dorjath
1 E−1503.004.003-Hiatt-Reeve vs 2-Chatfield-Chatfield
2 S−11001.006.001-Sera-Tutko vs 7-Duey-Hebner
4 S−11001.006.004-Schlinkert-Schlinkert vs 4-Darcey-Passinsky
2 S−11001.006.006-Flowers-Sonne-Shaw vs 8-Robinson-Jones

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
J 8 5 2
A 10 9 8
5 4 3
7 6
Q 10 6
6 3 2
A 10 9 7
K J 5
N
WE
S
A 7 3
Q 7 5
K Q J 2
10 9 4
K 9 4
K J 4
8 6
A Q 8 3 2

E 2N; W 1N; EW 2; NS 1; NS 1; NS 1; Par −120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 E−11007.000.009-Hu-Hu vs 4-Darcey-Passinsky
1 NTS1906.001.003-Hiatt-Reeve vs 1-Dougherty-Dougherty
1 S1705.002.005-Hopkins-Hopkins vs 5-Lipe-Lipe
2 E2904.003.001-Sera-Tutko vs 6-Anderson-Kaupp
2 N−11002.504.504-Schlinkert-Schlinkert vs 3-Chang-Dorjath
1 NTN−11002.504.507-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 9-Desantis-Erickson
2 S−22001.006.002-Gregor-Savoie vs 8-Robinson-Jones
3 N−33000.007.008-Harrelson-Corburn vs 2-Chatfield-Chatfield

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
9 5
A 8 5
10 8 6 2
A 5 3 2
K 8 6
2
K Q J 9 5 3
K Q J
N
WE
S
A J 10 7 4 2
K 3
A 4
8 6 4
Q 3
Q J 10 9 7 6 4
7
10 9 7

EW 5N; EW 5; EW 5; EW 3; NS 1; Par −460

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W51506.500.508-Harrelson-Corburn vs 2-Chatfield-Chatfield
4 S−31506.500.509-Hu-Hu vs 4-Darcey-Passinsky
4 E44205.002.005-Hopkins-Hopkins vs 5-Lipe-Lipe
5 E64802.504.501-Sera-Tutko vs 6-Anderson-Kaupp
4 E64802.504.502-Gregor-Savoie vs 8-Robinson-Jones
5 E64802.504.503-Hiatt-Reeve vs 1-Dougherty-Dougherty
4 E64802.504.504-Schlinkert-Schlinkert vs 3-Chang-Dorjath
5 E75100.007.007-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 9-Desantis-Erickson

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
K J 6 4 3
Q 5
Q 6 2
Q 4 2
Q 9 8 7 5
10 8
9 7 5 3
J 7
N
WE
S
A K 9 7 6 4 3
J 8
8 6 5 3
A 10 2
J 2
A K 10 4
A K 10 9

NS 4; N 5; N 5; S 4; S 4; EW 1; Par +620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ×E−23006.930.077-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 9-Desantis-Erickson
3 N41705.791.213-Hiatt-Reeve vs 1-Dougherty-Dougherty
4 E−21004.642.365-Hopkins-Hopkins vs 5-Lipe-Lipe
4 N−11002.364.644-Schlinkert-Schlinkert vs 3-Chang-Dorjath
4 N−11002.364.648-Harrelson-Corburn vs 2-Chatfield-Chatfield
4 N−11002.364.649-Hu-Hu vs 4-Darcey-Passinsky
5 S−22000.076.932-Gregor-Savoie vs 8-Robinson-Jones

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
K Q 7 2
Q 4 3
7 3
8 6 5 2
A 10 3
10 8
J 9 5
K J 10 9 4
N
WE
S
9
A J 6 5 2
A 8 6 2
A 7 3
J 8 6 5 4
K 9 7
K Q 10 4
Q

EW 4; EW 4; EW 2N; NS 2; EW 3; Par −300: NS 4×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 S31406.001.006-Flowers-Sonne-Shaw vs 6-Anderson-Kaupp
2 S31406.001.008-Harrelson-Corburn vs 1-Dougherty-Dougherty
3 S31406.001.009-Hu-Hu vs 3-Chang-Dorjath
3 W−11004.003.001-Sera-Tutko vs 5-Lipe-Lipe
3 S−1503.004.002-Gregor-Savoie vs 7-Duey-Hebner
2 E21101.505.503-Hiatt-Reeve vs 9-Desantis-Erickson
3 W31101.505.504-Schlinkert-Schlinkert vs 2-Chatfield-Chatfield
2 NTE21200.007.005-Hopkins-Hopkins vs 4-Darcey-Passinsky

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
A 10 9 7
9 7 3
A K
Q J 9 7
Q 6 5 2
Q 8
Q 10 9 7
10 5 3
N
WE
S
K J 3
10
J 6 5 4 2
K 8 6 4
8 4
A K J 6 5 4 2
8 3
A 2

NS 7; NS 6N; NS 5; NS 3; NS 1; Par +1510

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S75105.501.502-Gregor-Savoie vs 7-Duey-Hebner
4 S75105.501.503-Hiatt-Reeve vs 9-Desantis-Erickson
4 S75105.501.505-Hopkins-Hopkins vs 4-Darcey-Passinsky
4 S75105.501.509-Hu-Hu vs 3-Chang-Dorjath
4 S64803.004.006-Flowers-Sonne-Shaw vs 6-Anderson-Kaupp
4 S54502.005.008-Harrelson-Corburn vs 1-Dougherty-Dougherty
2 S62301.006.001-Sera-Tutko vs 5-Lipe-Lipe
3 S52000.007.004-Schlinkert-Schlinkert vs 2-Chatfield-Chatfield

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
J
A K 9 6 3 2
J 9
A Q 7 2
10 5
Q 10 4
7 5
K J 8 5 4 3
N
WE
S
A K 6
J 8 7
K Q 10 6 2
10 6
Q 9 8 7 4 3 2
5
A 8 4 3
9

NS 3; NS 2; NS 1N; NS 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 ×E−511007.000.002-Gregor-Savoie vs 7-Duey-Hebner
4 S46206.001.003-Hiatt-Reeve vs 9-Desantis-Erickson
3 N31405.002.001-Sera-Tutko vs 5-Lipe-Lipe
2 N21104.003.005-Hopkins-Hopkins vs 4-Darcey-Passinsky
3 N−11003.004.006-Flowers-Sonne-Shaw vs 6-Anderson-Kaupp
4 S−22001.505.508-Harrelson-Corburn vs 1-Dougherty-Dougherty
4 S−22001.505.509-Hu-Hu vs 3-Chang-Dorjath
4 S−33000.007.004-Schlinkert-Schlinkert vs 2-Chatfield-Chatfield

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
Q J 8 6 5
A K 10 9
K 10
10 7
2
Q 6 5 4 2
Q J 3
K 9 6 4
N
WE
S
10 4
J 8 7
A 5 4 2
A Q 5 2
A K 9 7 3
3
9 8 7 6
J 8 3

NS 3; EW 2; NS 1N; EW 2; EW 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N44206.001.001-Sera-Tutko vs 4-Darcey-Passinsky
4 N44206.001.004-Schlinkert-Schlinkert vs 1-Dougherty-Dougherty
4 N44206.001.007-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 7-Duey-Hebner
3 N41704.003.003-Hiatt-Reeve vs 8-Robinson-Jones
4 N−1502.504.505-Hopkins-Hopkins vs 3-Chang-Dorjath
4 N−1502.504.509-Hu-Hu vs 2-Chatfield-Chatfield
6 ×N−11000.506.502-Gregor-Savoie vs 6-Anderson-Kaupp
4 N−21000.506.506-Flowers-Sonne-Shaw vs 5-Lipe-Lipe

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
A 10 2
J 9 8 7 2
8 3
8 6 5
K 7 5
A
J 9 6 5
A Q 7 4 2
N
WE
S
Q 9 6
K Q 6 4 3
Q 10
J 10 3
J 8 4 3
10 5
A K 7 4 2
K 9

EW 3N; EW 4; EW 2; EW 2; EW 2; Par −600

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 W31105.501.502-Gregor-Savoie vs 6-Anderson-Kaupp
2 W31105.501.503-Hiatt-Reeve vs 8-Robinson-Jones
3 W31105.501.505-Hopkins-Hopkins vs 3-Chang-Dorjath
3 W31105.501.507-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 7-Duey-Hebner
2 NTW21203.004.006-Flowers-Sonne-Shaw vs 5-Lipe-Lipe
3 W41301.505.504-Schlinkert-Schlinkert vs 1-Dougherty-Dougherty
3 W41301.505.509-Hu-Hu vs 2-Chatfield-Chatfield
2 S−44000.007.001-Sera-Tutko vs 4-Darcey-Passinsky

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
K 9 7 5 2
10
J 10 7 4
7 3 2
4
K J 8 7 3 2
A Q 5 2
J 5
N
WE
S
Q J 8 6
A Q 9 5
9 6
9 8 6
A 10 3
6 4
K 8 3
A K Q 10 4

EW 4; NS 2; S 3; N 2; NS 1; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 S31406.500.502-Gregor-Savoie vs 6-Anderson-Kaupp
2 S31406.500.504-Schlinkert-Schlinkert vs 1-Dougherty-Dougherty
2 S21105.002.005-Hopkins-Hopkins vs 3-Chang-Dorjath
3 S−11004.003.009-Hu-Hu vs 2-Chatfield-Chatfield
2 W41702.504.501-Sera-Tutko vs 4-Darcey-Passinsky
2 W41702.504.506-Flowers-Sonne-Shaw vs 5-Lipe-Lipe
4 W44200.506.503-Hiatt-Reeve vs 8-Robinson-Jones
4 W44200.506.507-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 7-Duey-Hebner

Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
J 9 3
5
A J 9 6 5 4
A K 9
A 8 7 6
K J 3 2
Q 7 2
4 3
N
WE
S
K Q 2
Q 8 6 4
K 10
8 7 6 5
10 5 4
A 10 9 7
8 3
Q J 10 2

EW 2; EW 1N; NS 2; EW 1; NS 1; Par −100: NS 3×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 N31107.000.008-Harrelson-Corburn vs 8-Robinson-Jones
2 E−11006.001.004-Schlinkert-Schlinkert vs 9-Desantis-Erickson
2 N2903.004.001-Sera-Tutko vs 3-Chang-Dorjath
2 N2903.004.002-Gregor-Savoie vs 5-Lipe-Lipe
2 N2903.004.005-Hopkins-Hopkins vs 2-Chatfield-Chatfield
2 N2903.004.006-Flowers-Sonne-Shaw vs 4-Darcey-Passinsky
2 N2903.004.007-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 6-Anderson-Kaupp
2 N−1500.007.003-Hiatt-Reeve vs 7-Duey-Hebner

Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
A 10 5
K Q 10 8 7 2
8 7 5
3
J 6 4
9 6 3
Q 6 2
10 5 4 2
N
WE
S
8 7 2
J 5 4
A K J 10
A Q 8
K Q 9 3
A
9 4 3
K J 9 7 6

NS 3; NS 3; NS 2N; NS 2; NS 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N56507.000.002-Gregor-Savoie vs 5-Lipe-Lipe
4 S46206.001.008-Harrelson-Corburn vs 8-Robinson-Jones
4 W−55005.002.003-Hiatt-Reeve vs 7-Duey-Hebner
1 NTE−33004.003.006-Flowers-Sonne-Shaw vs 4-Darcey-Passinsky
3 N41702.504.505-Hopkins-Hopkins vs 2-Chatfield-Chatfield
3 N41702.504.507-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 6-Anderson-Kaupp
2 N31401.006.001-Sera-Tutko vs 3-Chang-Dorjath
3 S−11000.007.004-Schlinkert-Schlinkert vs 9-Desantis-Erickson

Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
9 8 7 3
8
A 8 2
A J 10 9 3
K J 10
K J 10 6 5 4 3
Q 3
K
N
WE
S
A 4
A Q 9 7 2
K J 10 7
8 4
Q 6 5 2
9 6 5 4
Q 7 6 5 2

EW 5; NS 2; EW 1N; NS 2; EW 1; Par −450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 W−1507.000.004-Schlinkert-Schlinkert vs 9-Desantis-Erickson
3 W52006.001.006-Flowers-Sonne-Shaw vs 4-Darcey-Passinsky
5 W54503.503.501-Sera-Tutko vs 3-Chang-Dorjath
4 W54503.503.503-Hiatt-Reeve vs 7-Duey-Hebner
5 W54503.503.507-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 6-Anderson-Kaupp
4 W54503.503.508-Harrelson-Corburn vs 8-Robinson-Jones
4 W64800.506.502-Gregor-Savoie vs 5-Lipe-Lipe
4 W64800.506.505-Hopkins-Hopkins vs 2-Chatfield-Chatfield

Board 25
North Deals
E-W Vul
7
J 10 5 4
J 5
J 10 9 7 6 5
A J 10 9 8 5 4
9 7 6
A
A 4
N
WE
S
K
A K Q 3
K Q 10 7 6 3
Q 8
Q 6 3 2
8 2
9 8 4 2
K 3 2

E 7N; W 6N; EW 6; EW 6; EW 6; EW 2; Par −2220

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 W−11007.000.009-Hu-Hu vs 9-Desantis-Erickson
5 W56505.002.003-Hiatt-Reeve vs 6-Anderson-Kaupp
4 W56505.002.004-Schlinkert-Schlinkert vs 8-Robinson-Jones
4 W56505.002.006-Flowers-Sonne-Shaw vs 3-Chang-Dorjath
4 W66802.005.002-Gregor-Savoie vs 4-Darcey-Passinsky
5 W66802.005.005-Hopkins-Hopkins vs 1-Dougherty-Dougherty
4 W66802.005.008-Harrelson-Corburn vs 7-Duey-Hebner
6 W614300.007.007-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 5-Lipe-Lipe

Board 26
East Deals
Both Vul
K 9 8
10 6 3
Q J 8 7 5
10 4
6
J 9 8 4
A K 4
Q 8 6 5 3
N
WE
S
A J 10 7 4 3
K 7 5 2
9 3 2
Q 5 2
A Q
10 6
A K J 9 7 2

E 3; EW 2; W 2; NS 1N; NS 2; NS 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 S31107.000.005-Hopkins-Hopkins vs 1-Dougherty-Dougherty
2 S2906.001.006-Flowers-Sonne-Shaw vs 3-Chang-Dorjath
3 S−11004.003.002-Gregor-Savoie vs 4-Darcey-Passinsky
3 S−11004.003.007-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 5-Lipe-Lipe
3 NTN−11004.003.009-Hu-Hu vs 9-Desantis-Erickson
2 E31401.505.503-Hiatt-Reeve vs 6-Anderson-Kaupp
3 E31401.505.504-Schlinkert-Schlinkert vs 8-Robinson-Jones
3 E41700.007.008-Harrelson-Corburn vs 7-Duey-Hebner

Board 27
South Deals
None Vul
A Q 10
A K Q 10 2
K 6 2
10 8
2
9 5 4 3
8 7 4 3
9 7 5 2
N
WE
S
K 9 5 4
J 8 7 6
Q
A Q 4 3
J 8 7 6 3
A J 10 9 5
K J 6

N 6; NS 5N; NS 5; N 5; S 4; S 5; NS 2; Par +920

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN64906.930.073-Hiatt-Reeve vs 6-Anderson-Kaupp
3 NTN54605.791.217-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 5-Lipe-Lipe
3 NTN44304.642.362-Gregor-Savoie vs 4-Darcey-Passinsky
4 S44203.503.504-Schlinkert-Schlinkert vs 8-Robinson-Jones
5 S54002.364.646-Flowers-Sonne-Shaw vs 3-Chang-Dorjath
4 N−21001.215.799-Hu-Hu vs 9-Desantis-Erickson
5 ××S−12000.076.938-Harrelson-Corburn vs 7-Duey-Hebner